14 September, 2010

The Political Flood

by Uddipan Mukherjee and Rajeev Sharma

Published in The Centre for Land Warfare Studies (CLAWS)


Wall Street Journal’s August 16 report that the Inter-Services Intelligence (popularly known by its acronym ISI) has displaced India from the position of Pakistan’s top ‘enemy’; was vindicated in barely two weeks by the string of blasts in major cities of that country, Lahore included. In fact, Pakistan suffered innumerable casualties in 2009 by the rampant ‘fidayeen’ attacks spearheaded by the Tehrik-i-Taliban. Nevertheless, the civil-military authority of the ‘land of the Quaid’ had appeared overtly insouciant with regard to the perceived threat from that angle.

A military operation in Waziristan, a melee in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and the US pressures to act against the Taliban Shura nestled in Quetta notwithstanding, the Pakistani military had showcased its strength in its eastern sector last year, citing the decades-long psychoneurotic threat from its ‘childhood enemy’.

The rationale behind such a demeanour was hardly unknown to the world. However, it is ironical that even divine disasters are utilised by the pachyderm power brokers to further their own interests.

Unprecedented floods have wreaked havoc to shatter the economy of the country. Yet, the response as against aid appeals so far is not upto expectations. As the Daily Telegraph, London, pointed in an editorial, that even the Gulf States appear indifferent to the suffering of fellow Muslims in Pakistan, while the offer of help from China, Pakistan’s all-weather friend is paltry.

Does all this underscore the image deficit, if not international pariah status, of Pakistan? It is tempting to reply in the affirmative. But how will that description fit a country, which is regularly hailed as the frontline ally in the ‘global war on terror’?

A time comes in every nation’s life when it has to confront reality and the floods have merely hastened that denouement for Pakistan. The international community has refused to share the entire flood burden as it did earlier on so many occasions. For Pakistan’s government though, all that aid was Zakat, and hence nothing out of the ordinary.

The apposite answer to the above stated query is that Islamabad’s continued dalliance with the ISI-created terror outfits even as it received billions of dollars in aid to fight the very menace of terrorism itself; is in essence the raison d’etre of the changed ‘global view’ toward Pakistan. Things have reached such an impasse that British Prime Minister David Cameron asked Pakistan to stop looking ‘both ways’. His remarks, according to a British daily, carried the endorsement of the White House.

The Daily Telegraph, which is in the forefront of the global media campaign for Pakistan, has not helped her cause either. Its correspondent, Dean Nelson, reported from Islamabad that more than £300 million in foreign aid for the victims of 2005 earthquake was misused by the Zardari government. The dispatch went on to say that ‘officials now feared that the alleged diversion of funds will deter donors from showering further aid’.

So, Pakistan’s desperation, if any, at ‘image make over’ makes perfect sense but not its reported readiness to give up its paranoia about India as its ‘number one’ enemy. Is one to construe that what the Americans failed to achieve in multiple visits, the flood fury did in a matter of weeks, and nixed Rawalpinidi (the general headquarters of the army) in conjuring up fears of an Indian attack?

Theorisations aside, India is central to Pakistani policies. The Army chief Kayani has made this unequivocally clear on more than one occasion. Interestingly, before taking up the present job, he headed the ISI, which has made this famous ‘India is not our main threat’ disclosure to the Wall Street Journal (WSJ). Even Gen. Athar Abbas, the chief Pakistan military spokesman, said he wasn't aware of ISI’s recent assessment pertaining to the threat (or the lack of it) from across the eastern side of Indus.

Incidentally, the deluge as well as the ‘renewed blasts’ demand a roll back of the army’s traditional policy of hostility towards India; at least in public. And the ‘story’ in the American economic daily simply bears an insignia to that. In fact, as if in resonance with the said report, President Zardari, on the occasion of ‘Defence Day’, expressed fears of an ‘existential threat’ to Pakistan due to ‘terrorism’ and ‘natural disaster’. And it is a matter of further bemusement that Zardari passed such a statement on a day which the Pakistanis commemorate as their defence of Lahore from the Indians in 1965!

On the other hand, the WSJ report must have come as a big relief to the US lawmakers, who have been told by the Congressional Research Service that “the American interests are primarily focused on Pakistan’s ability to control its territory to prevent it from being used as a haven for anti-American terrorists, and prevent inter-state conflict with India that would be regionally destabilising”.

Any how, who will check if the civil-military administration of Pakistan is actually in tune with the afore-mentioned media reports? Will the Americans do it? It remains a matter of speculation because the US relishes its stakes in the sub-continent not only as a ‘friend’ but also as a seller of goods and services through a uniquely American-esque multi-speak. Indians can check and hit the high octave but will the West at all bother about their Pakistani bogey? After all, India has no Haqqani network to drive out!

And what if the flood-induced discontent threatens the very fundamentals of the military establishment and political system of Pakistan? No guesses. It would definitely mean a re-establishment of India as Pakistan’s ‘enemy number one’.


Rajeev Sharma is a senior journalist-cum-author based in New Delhi. He writes in several global media outlets.


  1. (For the record, to declare any of my "biases" upfront: I'm an Indian citizen. I may be accused of being inherently biased. But I'm not. I know, detractors may quickly point fingers. I could care less. I have no need to apologise for my origin or opinions.)

    Please see following editorial on this topic by one Zubeida Mustafa ( zubeidam2@gmail.com ). It was published in Dawn few hours ago.


    As I read it, I have following thoughts in my mind:

    What is the definition of "schizophrenia"? For sure (using mathematical principle of "definition by example"), it is the charade called Pakistan and its place in global foreign policy since its inception. This has been heavily pronounced since modern era of Zia-ul-Huq rule. To overuse "definition by example" for the word "pronounced", it exacerbated after September 11 during Musharraf regime. It's like a contained malignant tumor that metastasized. But it wasn't a one hand clap. Myopic neo-con policies during Reagan administration, followed by Dubya (and Clinton as well) all contributed to it. This is common knowledge. What happened in the past has happened. It can't be undone.

    What of the present schizophrenia (let alone of future)? As it pertains to the flood relief aid and Pakistan's relation with India, why didn't Indian government call out a spade as a spade? I have very simple questions related to this.

    Comparisons of Pakistan floods with Haiti earthquake and Indian Ocean tsunami (biggest impact being to Indonesia) have been made. It is true that in many respects Pakistan flood impact is bigger. But how much of Haiti's or Indonesia's finances were tied up in defense budget compared to Pakistan's? Particularly, how much were Haiti and Indonesia spending on maintaining nuclear arsenal to defend against self-invented neuroses and schizophrenia? Do not give me crap about how those defense budgets or nuclear warheads are relevant to the so-called "war on terror". The world has seen how much Pakistan's cunning role in the "war on terror" has hurt mankind as a whole since Musharraf.

    [to be continued in part 2...]

  2. [continued from above...]

    I accuse the present Indian administration for being intentionally weak, insipid and dull for not exposing Pakistan's hypocrisy during this flood aid episode. It did NOT call out a spade as a spade. There has been very little discussion of any diversion of funds from Pakistan defense budget towards flood relief efforts. Or at least, I haven't seen any such discussion in the open. It is not a question of what pressure Obama / Hillary Clinton / Holbrooke / Robert Gates / John Kerry / Petreaus etc. continue to put on the puppet Pakistan government, ISI, military regarding this "war on terror". The question is, what have people like Manmohan Singh (proxy for Sonia Gandhi) / Krishna / Nirupama Rao / Chidambaram etc. done, to expose this hypocrisy to the international community? I literally accuse all these people in Indian government to be nincompoop dummies in this regard. For the life of me, I can't understand why they haven't jumped up and down in international community (UN, EU-India relations, US-India relations) making a big deal about it. I don't even think of it as an "opportunity" lost. Rather it is/was a "necessity" for the masses in Pakistan and stability of South Asia as a whole. If something so simple is obvious to a nobody like me, how can the Indian administration be letting down so badly? Extremely disappointing indeed.

    Look, I'm not talking about taking an extreme hawkish line along the lines of Advani or Ariel Sharon regarding this. I will not accept a "humanitarian" excuse for this let-down. What has not been "humanitarian" is the waste of resources maintaining Pakistani nuclear arsenal, while its people suffered in the floods AND Indian government offering its aid at the same time.

    I'll now step off my soapbox.

  3. Don't know where exactly to put this, so posting it here.

    Check out this horror of news from Gujrat, Pakistan. (This, so soon after the Sialkot horror which still hasn't had a verdict):

    Man bludgeoned to death with bricks after a minor argument over traffic dispute.


    There is no semblance of law and order left in this stupid pseudo-nation. It is nothing but a cesspool of human-created hell.

  4. Haha, take this:

    For a nation about to break apart, on its last legs.


    Pakistan has increased its defence budget by about $1.28bn... What a joke!!

  5. Once again, don't really know where to post it. So posting this here.

    Video showing Pakistan army carrying out mass executions in Swat.


    Clearly, there is no functioning judicial system in Pakistan.

  6. Shocking evidence of lack of any judicial system in Pakistan continues.

    Woman stoned to death by Taliban in NWFP, Pakistan. Horrific video:


    Pakistan Army executions in Swat (potentially of would-be suicide bombers, but there is legal system to try them in court of law?!?!?!). Another horrific video:


  7. Dear Anonymous,

    Thanks for these informative posts. If you permit, may like to interact with you more.

    thanks and regards

  8. Sure, will send you an email soon.

  9. Hello Everybody,
    My name is Mrs Sharon Sim. I live in Singapore and i am a happy woman today? and i told my self that any lender that rescue my family from our poor situation, i will refer any person that is looking for loan to him, he gave me happiness to me and my family, i was in need of a loan of S$250,000.00 to start my life all over as i am a single mother with 3 kids I met this honest and GOD fearing man loan lender that help me with a loan of S$250,000.00 SG. Dollar, he is a GOD fearing man, if you are in need of loan and you will pay back the loan please contact him tell him that is Mrs Sharon, that refer you to him. contact Dr Purva Pius,via email:(urgentloan22@gmail.com) Thank you.


    1. Name Of Applicant in Full:……..
    2. Telephone Numbers:……….
    3. Address and Location:…….
    4. Amount in request………..
    5. Repayment Period:………..
    6. Purpose Of Loan………….
    7. country…………………
    8. phone…………………..
    9. occupation………………
    11.Monthly Income…………..

    Email Kindly Contact: urgentloan22@gmail.com